Community Support Forum Redesign
"I led a team of three to redesign Community, a colleague support forum handling 1,000+ posts a month. The result was a 50% reduction in load times and 97 hours saved every month."
- 97 hrs Saved every month
- 50% Reduction in load times
- 1,000+ Posts handled monthly
- 3 Person research team led
Project summary
- What's Community?
- Community is a colleague support forum sitting within Santander's i-Exchange knowledge base. When normal processes don't cover an edge case, colleagues post a question and the wider organisation answers. It started as a pilot and grew to over 1,000 posts a month. It was a vital component of good customer outcomes.
- How did I get involved?
- The Product Owner approached me after seeing the impact of my work on i-Exchange. Community was growing fast and needed attention before it scaled further, specifically around load times and recognising top contributors.
- Problem statement
- "Community is getting more popular, we want to make sure we're ready to scale. We have problems with load times on the home page and we want to make sure we're celebrating our biggest contributors." (Danielle, Product Owner)
- What did research show?
- Four problems: posts from years ago dominated search results; the homepage was loading up to 10 seconds due to excessive live data; top contributors weren't being properly recognised; and key navigation menus were hidden on a separate page entirely.
- What did I do?
- I built and led a three-person research team from the community moderators, delegating research strands to match each person's strengths. I then redesigned the homepage, moved missing menus, introduced a leaderboard with hourly refresh, redesigned the post submission form, and implemented a bulk post expiry workaround.
- What was the result?
- Homepage load times fell from up to 10 seconds to around 3 seconds, a 50% reduction equating to 97 hours saved monthly across the operation. The redesigned homepage and new medal system were well received. Post expiry is still pending globally, but a bulk expiry workaround delivers a similar benefit.
Background
A growing platform that needed attention
Community is Santander's internal equivalent of Reddit or Quora, a place where colleagues can post edge-case questions and tap into the collective knowledge of the organisation. It lives within the i-Exchange knowledge base and has become a vital safety net: when the official process doesn't cover a situation, Community often does.
What started as a pilot had grown rapidly to over 1,000 posts a month with more business areas joining regularly. The Product Owner, Danielle, reached out after seeing the i-Exchange work and asked if I could address two growing pains: homepage load times that were getting worse as the platform scaled, and a feeling that the platform wasn't doing enough to recognise its most active contributors.
Building a team
I was still managing i-Exchange deployments in parallel, so I made a deliberate choice: rather than take this project on alone, I'd use it as an opportunity to lead. I reached out to three Community moderators (Samantha, Lee and Bonny) and assigned each a research strand matched to their strengths.
Samantha
Samantha is really good with people. She wants to sit down and talk to understand problems. I knew she'd be amazing at user interviews.
Lee
Lee is really technical, he loves to analyse to understand things. We needed to do competitor analysis and Lee was perfect for this.
Bonny
Bonny is great at finding answers. Her understanding of face to face banking is second to none. She set up observations with branch staff.
Empathise
Four research streams, one clear picture
Across surveys, interviews, observational studies, and competitor analysis, the team produced a consistent picture of where Community was falling short. We came back together to share findings and consolidate them into themes.
Research findings
Once we had completed each research piece, we came back together and shared the key insights.
-
Surveys
Outdated content
Samantha, Bonny and I surveyed all staff to understand their goals and pain points. A consistent theme emerged: posts from 2021 onwards had never been removed, older content was dominating search results and answers that were once correct were now actively misleading colleagues.
-
Competitor analysis
Missing questions
Lee analysed support forums like Reddit and ServiceNow Community to benchmark our approach. The finding was striking: every competitor surfaced new and trending posts immediately on the homepage. Community did not show a single question on the homepage at all, directly contradicting Jakob's Law. Users arrive expecting familiar patterns and we were breaking them from the first screen.
-
User interviews
Missing recognition
Samantha interviewed contact centre and live chat colleagues to understand how they used Community day to day. Despite points, badges and a leaderboard existing, top contributors felt invisible. Recognition was there in theory but buried in practice.
-
Observational studies
Hidden menus
Bonny spent time in branch running usability testing and observational studies. She found that key actions like My network, My posts, Achievements and notifications were all hidden on a separate page called myExchange, completely disconnected from where colleagues expected to find them.
Heuristic analysis
This is a support forum, but there are no questions on the home page. Our competitor analysis revealed this major flaw.
Key menus like My network, My posts and Achievements were held on a separate page. Why weren't they shown on Community?
Each forum had a purpose, but we needed to find a better way to display them. A General category doesn't count as effective grouping.
The information on each forum, recent discussions and live leaderboards were causing excessive load times.
One of our biggest drivers for engagement was users collecting their points, why do we only give them a tiny portion of the home page.
Most Community posts relate to a process on i-Exchange, but the reference for the process was often missing.
The Recently viewed articles on the right were supposed to prompt getting the i-Exchange reference, but these were often ignored.
The instructions were too long to read and the text was tiny. This copy needed to be simplified.
Users are able to add attachments, but it's not well signalled. There are often complaints that they can't do this, but really they just can't find it.
Define
Four problems, each with a real cost
The old post problem
When checking if the question has been answered before, how do they know that a four year old answer is still correct? Community has been active since 2021 with no content expiry in place. Posts were growing rapidly with no mechanism to retire outdated answers. We needed to strike a balance between keeping posts relevant and not taking away the huge amount of knowledge held in previous answers.
"The search list is full of posts from years ago, the answers provided then don't help me today."
The loading problem
It was obvious why we had a loading problem. The homepage displayed the forum name, number of questions, number of comments and last activity for 20 forums. Loading 4 years worth of information is not necessary. When speaking to users they did not find the information useful, however the product owner and moderators were keen on keeping it. The trade-off needed to be made explicit.
"When users come to Community they wait an age for content to load, when it finally loads they're getting on with something else."
The recognition problem
Gamification was a big part of Community from launch, and it worked. Users loved competing for points and badges. But the colleagues putting in the most effort weren't seeing themselves reflected back. I had all the data I needed. The challenge was surfacing it without recreating the load time problem.
"I've answered hundreds of posts over the years but I never really see my name up there. You'd think after all that time it would be a bit more obvious."
The missing menus problem
Community network, previous posts, profile, achievements and notifications were all held on myExchange, a separate section of the i-Exchange website. Two feedback forums existed, but the prompt told users to ask a question. This was the wrong framing for someone trying to report an issue or leave a suggestion. We needed to review the key journeys, organise content correctly and make sure our forms were clear.
"Key information for Community is held on myExchange and when I want to give feedback I'm told to ask a question. None of this makes sense!"
Ideate
Simple solutions, well argued
I scheduled design workshops with Samantha, Lee and Bonny to work through solutions for each problem we'd identified.
Posts needed to expire, but what if we lost helpful information?
A logical solution to outdated content is for it to expire. We had to decide between reviewing 50,000 Community posts manually or setting all posts over a year old to expire automatically.
Automatic expiry was the best option, but we needed a contingency. We agreed a control for expired posts, allowing moderators to reactivate them if required.
Push back on expiring posts
The post expiry request needed to go through a global ideation forum. Santander UK were the only group using Community, but we needed votes from the other countries. Why would they vote for something that doesn't benefit them?
We gave ourselves the best chance by building a strong business case to share with the UK Platform Lead, but we weren't optimistic. We got to work on a plan B, opting for a bulk update to expired posts each month. One way or another we were going to clean up Community!
The home page data had to go
The table of data on the home page wasn't helping our frontline colleagues and it was the right call to remove it. The product owner and moderators weren't sure, but once I'd made the case for improving load times they agreed the trade-off was worth it.
More data problems with the new leaderboards
The same problem appeared when looking at leaderboard data. Looking up total points for every user on every page load would have recreated the exact problem we'd just solved. The compromise was an hourly refresh, removing the need to recalculate on every visit.
Moving menus
The existing tabs on myExchange were simply lifted onto Community home, redesigned and stripped back to the most useful options. Favourites stayed on myExchange, Events were removed, and iconography was added to make each option easier to distinguish at a glance.
Redesigned forms
We ran a workshop to ideate solutions for the forms, prioritising ideas that required less developer effort given our limited resource. Clearer prompts, a visible attachments section and an i-Exchange article lookup made the journeys significantly easier to follow.
Prototype
Turning the direction into screens
With the forum data removed, there was plenty of real estate available on the home page. I thought it was odd that a forum didn't have any posts immediately available, so I created a new pinned posts section for moderators to promote certain posts.
A leaderboard worth seeing
The new leaderboard section was eye catching and made our users feel like their efforts on Community were finally being recognised. Using data I already had available meant no additional development time.
New home for the missing menus
The new tabs were placed exactly where they belong, giving users everything they needed on Community without sending them to myExchange.
Simplified forms
By amending the copy and adding some visual indicators, we were able to signal the purpose of each forum. Feedback forums had a Give feedback prompt, while support forums were headed Ask a question. This was just one part of the form redesign. Scroll down to see the whole form UI!
Test
Validating before going to production
-
Loading times
By setting up a reduced version of the existing home page in the test environment, I was able to check how much load times improved when the forum data was removed. Across my team, load times now averaged 2-3 seconds. I knew from experience that test environment load times don't always reflect production, and this didn't factor in the new content I was adding to the home page. That said, it was a good indicator we were going in the right direction!
-
Old posts impact
I ran a test where I removed the majority of older posts and checked five common search queries. The results were far more relevant with all the old junk removed!
-
New forms
A focus group reviewing the new forms found users were much happier with the layout. The ability to select an article reference was particularly welcomed. These were deliberate low-cost changes, so it was good to see them land well.
-
Recognition
We spoke to some of our top contributors and a few users who had been active previously but dropped off. We wanted to know if the new leaderboard display would be enough to bring them back. Generally people were more inclined to compete, and the breakdown at forum level meant users could compete locally within their own teams. I hadn't appreciated how much people were bought into winning a leaderboard spot on Community!
Final product
The final product
Redesigned homepage
Missing menus had a new home. Now Community members had everything they need in one place.
A brighter hero section welcomes the user and immediately offers the key journeys of posting and searching.
Making some posts front and centre meant getting more eyes on the biggest posts.
We threw out the big list and replaced it with clearly organised forums. We used card sorting with users to define these.
I expanded the leaderboard section, including the ability to see the highest scoring users on each forum.
Redesigned post submission form
The new intro section gave the correct context and could be switched to give feedback depending on the forum.
A simple lookup menu allowed users to reference processes from i-Exchange.
Instructions for writing a post were reduced and bulleted. This made it easier for users to do what they came here to do.
Providing a new section for attachments meant that users could easily share files when they needed to.
Results
What changed
-
97 hrs
Saved every month
Removing the heavy homepage data reduced colleague waiting time across the operation.
-
50%
Reduction in load times
The redesigned homepage avoided reloading live forum statistics on every visit.
-
~3 sec
Homepage load time
Load time fell from up to 10 seconds to around 3 seconds after the main data table was removed.
Removing the live forum data table cut homepage load times from up to 10 seconds to around 3 seconds, a 50% reduction that translated directly to 97 hours saved across the operation every month. The redesigned homepage and post form brought Community visually in line with Santander's internal design system for the first time.
The expanded leaderboard and medal system were well received by the community. Colleagues who had previously been active but drifted re-engaged when they saw their contributions being properly recognised. The per-forum competition mechanic (which emerged from testing rather than the original brief) became one of the most talked-about additions.
Post expiry via the global ideation forum didn't pass, as anticipated. The bulk expiry workaround (run monthly by the moderation team) delivered a similar improvement to content relevance without requiring the global vote.
I moved on from Santander shortly after this project completed. The load time saving is the hardest figure I have and the one I am most confident in.
Retrospective
What I'd do differently
-
I don't need to do everything
Delegating research to Samantha, Lee, and Bonny, each matched to a strand that suited their skills, produced better work than I'd have managed alone while juggling i-Exchange. It's something I want to get more deliberate about on future projects.
-
Keep it simple
The biggest wins on this project came from removing things, moving things, and relabelling things. Nothing required building from scratch. I've previously defaulted to starting from scratch, but on this project working with what already existed was more effective and lower cost.
-
Pivoting when blocked
The global vote on post expiry was always a long shot, and it didn't pass. Having plan B already prepared meant we didn't lose momentum. The bulk expiry workaround wasn't the elegant solution, but it delivered the same outcome for users.
More case studies
i-Exchange Knowledge Base Overhaul
35% search accuracy improvementOverhauling Santander's 6,000-article internal knowledge base to fix broken search, delivering a 35% accuracy improvement across 5 million annual searches.
8 min readCassi: AI Chatbot Feedback Redesign
30% increase in feedback submissionsFixing Santander's AI colleague assistant in three weeks at zero development cost, increasing feedback submission rates by 30%.
5 min read